What we know about the Trump administration’s regard for animals so far is troubling. In the early weeks of his presidency, Trump had many government websites scrubbed of information – a clear indication that transparency is not in the game plan. Among them was the USDA website which for many years had posted inspection reports on roughly 8000 facilities (such as puppy mills, research labs, zoos and circuses) required to treat their animals humanely under the Animal Welfare Act and the Horse Protection Act. The searchable database allowed the public to see things like which research labs were letting monkeys die of thirst and lose body parts in fights due to negligence. It also provided an opportunity to see which puppy mills passed USDA inspection – a low, very low, how can I say this? L O W bar – and which were repeat violators. Several states have passed laws requiring pet stores to buy puppies only from breeders not cited for violations by the USDA. With the inspection reports now gone, it is unclear how these pet stores, or anyone else, would find out the federal inspection history of any breeding facility.
Due to public outcry (thing I never tire of typing), the feds relented and put a “small fraction of the cache back online.” But the most credible effort to date at holding the USDA accountable is coming from a private citizen by the name of Russ Kick. He has set up a blog to repost the deleted documents, provide links to other sites doing the same, and ask for help from anyone who has saved any of the disappeared reports. (Anyone wanting to support his one man effort can do so here.)
Then there is the Trump budget proposal. While it is up to Congress to work out and decide upon the details, the proposal does give us insight into Trump’s vision for American families (and by family, I mean anyone who loves and shares their home with another being). In a nutshell: bombs IN, poor people OUT. Of the numerous proposed cuts within the budget, many will directly impact families if passed by Congress. These include cuts to housing for low income people as well as:
- “The Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), which directly provides baby formula, healthy foods, nutrition counseling, and more to poor mothers with young children[.]“
- “[Meals on Wheels] which delivers meals to individual homes and senior centers, feeds more than 2.4 million Americans 60 and older—more than half a million of them veterans.“
- Before and after school programs which feed hungry children while educating them.
And incidentally, the farmers who grow the food used in these anti-hunger programs will be negatively impacted as well.
It is estimated that approximately 65% of U.S. households have pets. These include low income families. If Americans who were previously relying on government assistance to help with things like baby formula, school lunches, and meals for homebound relatives are cut off from that assistance, pets will be impacted. When families suffer, pets suffer.
Pets who provide enormous benefits to senior citizens and veterans, may end up being fed from the reduced food available to the owner (resulting in even less food for these already at-risk people), be surrendered to shelters or perhaps not even adopted in the first place. When families suffer, pets suffer.
As the public learns about the proposed cuts to these essential family programs, they will rush to open their wallets and offer support. Because that’s what we do. At the same time, with so many valuable services being cut from the federal budget, competition for donation dollars will increase. And compassion fatigue will set in. Indeed, an insurance company recently debuted a television ad depicting a man feeling overwhelmed by so many worthy causes and issues in his community – the first of which is represented by a shelter dog. Rescue groups can expect to work harder for every donated dollar and volunteer hour as compassionate people spread their resources far and wide.
What you can do:
- Check to see if your Congressman signed this letter to Trump asking that the USDA documents be restored to the website. If he/she did, call his/her office to say thank you and ask that the issue not be dropped. If he/she did not sign, call and request that he/she support this effort. Senator Cory Booker (D – NJ) has set up a petition. (Note: petitions are ok but phone calls are the thing. Start making calls. Plan to keep making them. Every voice is needed – even quiet ones.)
- Call your elected representatives and tell them to reject the cruel Trump vision for American families outlined in his budget proposal. Demand that they stand up and fight for our shared values and rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all.
10 thoughts on “Animal Welfare in the Age of Trump”
Sent from my iPhone
Good to see you back and thank you for that great Blog.
Couldn’t have said it better myself! So glad you’re back. I agree the outlook is very grim but we are in this for the long haul & there still is lots that can be done —
What I don’t understand it why remove the data in the first place? Unless there’s some idea towards getting rid of federal-level protection acts (with an eye towards making it a state issue)? It’s very concerning.
I suspect it’s for the benefit of those big industries who are now able to do pretty much whatever they want, without any regulation. He’s doing it to many.
The stated reason mentioned privacy. I guess animal abusers want their privacy. You’d think the facilities that have clean records would be making a fuss bc by removing ALL the reports, there is no way to distinguish between abusers and those with no history of violations. But maybe the giant lure of deregulation conquers all, as db points out.
Thank you. And again, welcome back. You’ve been missed!
Sadly Chris Collins is my Congressman. I don’t like what he stands for at all .As with many other letters, e-mails I have written him about animal welfare I have been ignored.
not Trump at all.. This has to do with privacy Many breeders who have minor or even corrected violations are still on the site and are harassed and bullied by the animal rights zealots. It also has to do with safety as many of these groups are becoming violent and dangerous