Stockton Pound Sued for Killing Animals Illegally

Last month, a couple whose dog had been impounded by the Stockton pound in CA spoke to the city council about their experience.  Their microchipped, neutered, vaccinated dog had escaped through a gate accidentally left open in their yard.  When the owners, both newly unemployed, tried to reclaim their pet, the Stockton pound demanded $180.  The owners couldn’t come up with the entire fee so offered a partial payment and a promise to pay the balance in installments.  The pound refused, leaving the crying owners no other option but to beg for their beloved family member’s life.  Stockton killed their pet.

As might be expected, this is not an isolated incident at the Stockton pound:

A review of 2013 documents found instances in which seven dogs belonging to five people were euthanized because the owners could not immediately afford to pay impound fees.

The Stockton pound is no stranger to controversy.  Mayor Anthony Silva put together a citizen commission to examine allegations of wrongdoing at the facility one year ago.  The group has been trying to present its findings since January but have yet to be allowed to speak at a city meeting.

Now local advocates have teamed up with the Animal Legal Defense Fund and filed suit against the Stockton pound.  Using a year’s worth of pound documents obtained via public records requests, the plaintiffs in the suit allege:

  • Stockton killed more than 1500 cats and dogs during their legally mandated holding periods.
  • The pound kills owned pets without making meaningful efforts to return the animals to their owners.  One case involved a dog who was killed because the owners couldn’t speak English.
  • Pets who are medically hopeless and suffering are forced to linger in their cages for days before being euthanized.

ALDF attorney Jenni James says no money is being sought in the suit:

“Our request is very simple,” James said. “We’re asking the court to demand that the city of Stockton follow its own laws, and for the city of Stockton to acknowledge that the laws it passed apply to the shelter.”

The pound’s director went the predictable route in response to the lawsuit:

The city of Stockton said it cannot comment on the lawsuit and neither can the Animal Services director — but she did say the shelter does the best it can for the animals.

“People who come here see the impact and how many dogs come into the shelter,” Animal Services Supervisor Pat Claerbout said. “It’s extremely limited, and we can’t keep every animal.”

We’re doing the best we can. We can’t keep them all.  Ergo, the law doesn’t apply to us and if your broke ass can’t come up with the ransom to bail your pet out of our kill factory, sux being you.

(Thanks Clarice and Eileen for the links.)

Leave a comment

7 Comments

  1. Obviously your best isn’t good enough! There is too much abuse in shelters. We need change desperately and they need to terminate the abusers!

    Reply
  2. jan

     /  March 14, 2014

    http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2012/07/27/animal-shelter-director-under-investigation-for-allegedly-killed-dogs-set-to-be-rescued/

    the head of this “shelter” has been doing this for YEARS this from 2012 this must have the goods on someone higher up why else would they keep an animal hater like this in place? she is cruel incompetent witch

    Reply
  3. mikken

     /  March 14, 2014

    Clearly the issue runs very deep there. The corruption needs to be scraped out of every nook and cranny and cleansed with fire…

    So glad that there’s now a lawsuit. Money is the only thing these bastards understand.

    Reply
  4. Jan, Pat Claerbout transfers a lot of “cute and fluffies” to her buddy rescues, and they speak up for her whenever she’s in trouble. There’s a whole web of self-interested parties keeping her in place and trying to prevent reform, even with a lawsuit now filed. If you want to keep up with the story, come to Central California Pets Alive on FB.

    Reply
  5. Thanks, YesBiscuit, for telling this story.

    Reply
  6. Karen F

     /  March 14, 2014

    Among the self-interested parties that Eileen mentions is a “rescue” in Washington state that has helped provide political cover for Pat Claerbout. You’ll find the usual apologist language in this story from last year:

    http://www.komonews.com/news/local/You-love-them-Local-group-rescues-dogs-that-didnt-have-a-chance-188585641.html?tab=video&c=y

    If I understand right, Claerbout started her tenure in Stockton by killing more than 900 dogs in her first month on the job, without ever reaching out to the public or holding adoption specials. The city has done nothing but defend her.

    It is just beyond my understanding that traditionalists can see the same officially sanctioned violence we do, and react by saying “spay and neuter.”

    Reply
  7. Wow.. $180 to release a dog. Really? It’s mircochipped scan the dog. Geesh we aa pet owners are preached that microchipping can save our four legged family members life and after reading your posts steadily over the past few months makes me wonder if its worth it at all.

    Reply

Speak!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: